Posted by: Kevin Davis | January 19, 2008

MPs salaries

Next week there is a vote for MPs to vote through above inflation  pay rises for themselves.

I have to admit to being a little bemused why they vote through their own pay rise - maybe it is something I should start in the organisation I run, I wonder how long it would continue trading for!!

The fact is their pay should be linked to the increases given to a grade in the civil service and they should then have no role in it.

However, there is a more interesting hidden element in the new arrangements. Parliament will now be allowing all MPs the cost of having an office both in parliament and in the constituency. For years they have looked at this but have struggled with setting a financial sum to cover the rent in both Aberdeen and Kensington. So, they have decided to back an arrangement that allows MPs a fixed square footage of office in their constituency - fixed at 800 sq ft. Anything over that would need to be paid for by the MP. It could well be there will be some anxious MPs out there, who are leasing office space from their own political party (who own the building), because they might find, suddenly, that they will not be able to claim as much money as they used to and could be lumbered with a building they really cannot afford.

But the new arrangements also go further. For every member of staff that you decide to base in parliament, rather than your constituency, you will be allowed 100 sq ft less in the constituency. So, have two staff in Westminster and you can only have 600 sq ft in the constituency.

Will be interesting to see how this affects the way MPs operate their offices and support.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Responses

Kevin

Whose law is it that states “If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys?”

There’s a story that a prosperous young lady was haranguing her local Conservatives, & they eventually told her that, if she felt so strongly, why didn’t she get out & get elected? She thought it was an excellent idea, until she discovered she couldn’t afford to take the salary cut!

If it were possible to construct an appraisal system that evaluated each MPs performance after each parliamentary session and then rewarded those whose perfromance was judged worthy of higher pay levels,then I might support a pay scale that allowed the best to achieve a really decent salary.

Such a scheme would have to be outside government control and be set up by somebody such as McKinseys or the Boston Consulting Group and be evaluated by a panel of succesful private sector business people.

New MPs would have to accept a modest basic salary AND Pension Scheme(say £50,000 and 1/60th) until they proved worthy of a more generous package.

We want the CEO type of people, so we must attract them in the same way CEO’s are attracted.

Some maybe but not the likes of the Northern Rock or Sports Direct CEOs and certainly not Mr Branson

Do you think they would stand a chance of being elected, even if they were attracted to stand for election?

Sadly if they stood in the appropriate constituency they could get elected but it is most unlikely that such a position would appeal to them.
They are all so ferociously ambitious they all expect to get invited to join the Lords and perhaps the odd contribution to party funds along the way……

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories